A dispute over rising transportation costs has emerged ahead of the 2026 World Cup, with officials in the United States criticising governing body FIFA over what they describe as an unfair financial burden on fans.
The controversy centres on sharply increased travel fares to key stadiums, particularly in the New York and New Jersey area, where some of the tournament’s most significant matches are scheduled to take place. Moroccan supporters are expected to be among those most affected, given their team’s fixtures at venues impacted by the price hikes.
New Jersey Governor Micky Sherrill has publicly called on FIFA to contribute to transport costs, arguing that fans should not bear the full financial strain. She has urged the organisation to either subsidise travel expenses or provide direct financial support.
Sharp rise in fares raises concerns
Reports indicate that train fares for World Cup matches could exceed $100 for a 30-minute journey between Pennsylvania Station in New York and MetLife Stadium. This represents a significant increase from the usual fare of approximately $12.90.
There are also no planned concessions for children or elderly passengers, meaning all travellers would be required to pay full price. The scale of the increase has prompted widespread concern, particularly among international supporters planning to attend multiple matches.
MetLife Stadium, which will be temporarily branded as the New York/New Jersey Stadium during the tournament, is set to host eight matches, including the final on 19 July 2026.
Similar issues reported in other host cities
The issue extends beyond New Jersey. Travel costs to Gillette Stadium in the Boston area have also risen significantly, with train fares reaching around $80 and bus tickets approximately $95.
In addition, parking fees at key venues have reached what critics describe as excessive levels, with charges of about $225 at MetLife Stadium and $175 in Boston.
Governor Sherrill has made clear her opposition to passing these costs onto local residents or public transport users. In a message posted on social media platform X, she stated: “We inherited an agreement where FIFA contributes nothing to transportation costs, while the New Jersey Transit Authority foots a $48 million bill to transport fans safely.” She added, “I will not allow New Jersey residents to bear this burden for years to come. FIFA must pay for transportation.”
FIFA defends existing agreements
In response, FIFA officials expressed surprise at the criticism, maintaining that agreements with host cities clearly outline that transport services are to be provided at operating cost rather than free of charge.
The organisation said it has worked closely with host cities over several years to develop transport strategies and has supported efforts to secure infrastructure funding. FIFA also emphasised that the pricing structure is consistent with costs typically associated with major sporting events and concerts held at the same venues.
Impact on Morocco’s World Cup campaign
The financial implications are expected to be particularly significant for fans of the Moroccan national team. Both MetLife Stadium and Gillette Stadium are scheduled to host matches involving Morocco, increasing the likelihood that supporters will face elevated travel expenses.
Morocco are set to play Brazil at the New York/New Jersey venue, while another group-stage fixture against Scotland will take place in Boston. These matches are likely to attract large travelling support, amplifying concerns about affordability.
Growing Pressure Ahead of Global Tournament
With the 2026 World Cup approaching, the dispute highlights broader concerns over the rising cost of attending the tournament across the United States, Canada and Mexico. As discussions continue, the balance between operational realities and fan accessibility remains a key issue for organisers and host authorities alike.
